Author: admin

Colorado Emissions Testing, the Bad and Good

Colorado emissions testing is an unnecessary burden and expense forced upon the people by a corrupt and oppressive government. In the Denver, Colorado area, vehicles are required to be inspected every two years before they can be registered. Welfare and food stamp recipients are required to have their cars tested but most of them can register their vehicles without passing the emissions test. People who work for a living are required to either bring their cars into compliance or spend at least on $715 repair bills.

The emissions racket does have a drive-by program. If a vehicle drives by two different mobile roadside testing locations and pass, the owner will receive a notice on their registration renewal that they do not need to bring their car into a brick-and-mortar testing facility. They will still need to pay the $25 extortion fee.

Two years ago, I worked in affluent Boulder. On my way to work I would regularly pass roadside testing sites. My renewal said Emissions Test Not Required but I still had to pony up the $25 shakedown. I later switched to a new job that was in an area only slightly less affluent than Boulder. No roadside tests on the way to work. When I took my car to the testing facility, the tester tested my car then immediately demanded the $25 fee, scribbled on the form, then finally handed me the marred form and informed me that my car had failed. When the tester started writing on the form, I immediately knew my car had failed the test even before he informed me of the results.

That was my second vehicle that had failed over a period of only a few months. After the first vehicle failed, I took it to our regular mechanic. He told me the car failed because the engine was worn out. My options were to rebuild the engine or to register in a county that did not require the test. I live only two blocks inside the testing area. Two blocks further out, I’d be in Park County and would have been able to avoid this testing nonsense. There was one other option. A new O2 sensor might help but it was a longshot, no guarantees. After picking up the car, our mechanic proclaimed the car would pass. “Guaranteed!”. It didn’t. The mechanic was not sympathetic or helpful when we told them it failed. If we wanted them to look at it again, they would charge us $100 for additional diagnosis. Up until that time we were good customers, the mechanic provided us good service and treaded us more than fairly.

As you may have noticed I do not have a high opinion of the emissions testing program.   Air Care Colorado does offer a service which I do have a high opinion of. If a vehicle fails twice, Air Care Colorado will provide a diagnosis and make recommendations at no charge. When we took our first car in, they told us if there was no warning light for the O2 sensor replacement was a waste of money. The problem was a bad catalytic converter. They recommended we replace our converter with a California catalytic converter. When we found a new mechanic, we insisted he install a California converter. He complied with our wishes and replaced the converter per the recommendation. The car passed.

After our Mercedes failed the first time, I took the car to our new mechanic. We discussed options and mutually decided the best course of action would be to replace the spark plugs. He told us we had the wrong kind of spark plugs for our vehicle, replaced the plugs and told us the car seemed to run better. I didn’t necessarily expect the car to pass the second time around, but I hoped it would at least get closer to passing. I watched the monitor as the vehicle was being tested. “Second chance test”. That didn’t sound good. In Colorado, after a fail, the second test is “free”. Is the monitor saying this was my second, “free” test, or did it mean the car had already failed and it was testing again just to make sure?

Since there was no charge for the second test, the tester didn’t demand I pony up before informing me of the results. Even before printing the form she said “I don’t think you passed”. Then she printed the form, scribbled on it, then told me I had a lousy mechanic. The car failed worse than it did the first time. My new mechanic had no idea about what do next. “Take it to another mechanic for an estimate, let them determine what needs to be done, then bring it back to me” he said.

I had good experience with Air Care’s diagnosis of the first vehicle so I took the Mercedes in for the no-cost analysis. Different analyst, different recommendation. I have a bad O2 sensor Justin said. I asked “but there was no dash light”, he said he tested it and regardless of the light, the sensor was bad. Justin then spent time with me explained in detail why the bad sensor was causing the car to fail. I asked him about other things I can do to get a better chance of passing. He patiently and professionally answered all my questions. I asked him if changing the fuel would help.

“Lower or higher octane?”

“No that won’t help.”

“Higher alcohol in the fuel?”

“Don’t do that. It won’t help and may cause damage”

So I followed Justin’s recommendation and paid a different mechanic to replace the O2 Sensor. The car passed.

I still believe the emission testing program is a racket and a scam. Emissions testing is an infringement on the people’s rights by a tyrannical government. I resent being forced to take in my car for testing and then stressing over whether or not my car will pass. But there is one high point in the program. I have a high regard for the technicians who performed the diagnosis and analysis and made recommendations about what we needed to do to get our vehicles to pass. My regular mechanics couldn’t figure out the problems. The Air Care technicians were able to determine exactly what I needed to do to pass the damn test.…

Why?

Why?

If a black or Hispanic can be proud of their race why is it racist for a white to be proud of his?

Why are there leaders of the black community, Hispanic community, Native American community, etc, but racist to ask for a leader of the white community?

Why is the NAACP a civil rights organization, but the NAAWP is considered a racist organization?

Why is it OK to say person of color, but not colored, but OK to say National Association for the Advancement of Colored People?

Why is it OK to suggest that a minority cannot succeed without affirmative action, but racist to suggest that a minority succeeded because of it?

Why do schools need to invoke affirmative action for blacks and Hispanics but not Asians? Why is it racist to give the real answer to the question?

Why are the Promise Keepers (men should take responsibility for their families) a sexist organization but the Million Man March (black men should take responsibility for their families) good, responsible men?

Why is it OK to suggest that low graduation rates for minorities are the schools fault but racist to suggest that higher unemployment and lower wages for minorities could be related to their lack of education?

Why is it OK to blame schools for low minority CSAP scores (illiteracy) but “offensive” to suggest that minorities have a higher illiteracy rate?

Why it is OK for a minority to express disappointment that a white person was hired over a minority, but racist for a white person to express disappointment that a minority was hired over a white person?

Why is “offensive” for a white to mock minorities who express disappointment that a white person was hired over a minority, but not the other way around?

Why is it racist to suggest that the US protect its border?

Why is it racist to expect someone to speak English, but OK to expect someone to speak Spanish? Why is it racist to suggest that a resident who can’t speak English might not be here legally?

Why is black-on-white crime a regular crime, but white-on-black crime a “hate crime”?

Why it is OK to criticize that high incarceration rates among blacks and Hispanics, but racist to suggest that maybe it’s because they commit more crimes?

Why is honkey, cracker, gringo, homophobe, etc. OK not OK use derogatory terms for non-whites or homosexuals?

Why is it OK to vote for a non-white because of his race, but racist to vote against a non-white because of his race?

Why is it racist to say anything bad about MLK? Why is it racist to suggest that he doesn’t deserve a holiday? Why is it racist to ask for a white holiday? Oh, wait, it’s racist to suggest that MLK day is primarily a black holiday. But why?

Why is it OK to celebrate differences (for minorities only), but racist to suggest that some “bad” differences might exist too?

Why does diverse include everything but white men?

Why is there no such thing as a black or Hispanic racist?

Why is demanding reparations for decedents of slaves OK (being against reparations is racist after all), but offering repatriation is racist? If Africa has such a rich culture, why doesn’t anybody want to go back? Oh, wait to suggest that it racist. Why is it racist say slavery wouldn’t have been possible without of the cooperation of Africans who sold their brothers and sisters (even though it’s true)? To point out that most slavery today is in Africa is racist (even though it’s true). Europeans and Americans are racist because they don’t prevent African slavery and genocide. But if they did attack an African country, that would be racist too. Why?

Genocide? Isn’t that where one race annihilates another? Aren’t Africans all black? We’ll yes, but the shade and nose shape varies, and that’s different enough. Oh there I go again with my offensive rants! Suggesting that black Africans are racist against each other is surely a racist comment even though it’s true. Why?

Why is it racist to speak the truth, and the “correct” to deny it?

If you consider this blog “offensive” and racist, why?…